【新唐人2014年02月18日讯】东莞扫黄扩大 官民舆论战引关注
中共喉舌《央视》高调报导广东东莞色情业之后，中共的所谓扫黄运动，从广东省已经扩大到全中国的九个省份，但是，吸引外界注意力的，并不是被网友讽刺为“打虎打到鸡”的扫黄成果，而是事件中，大陆官方与民间的舆论大战。
2月9号《央视》的报导一出，立刻引起网路舆论反弹，不仅以“东莞挺住！”等中共官方舆论常用的煽情语句抗议《央视》，还有不少网民甚至直接指斥《央视》长期“出卖灵魂”，它的罪恶远胜于东莞性工作者出卖身体。
大陆媒体人贾葭评论说，在这次事件中，中共官方媒体首次失去了多年来对政治议题的主导能力，民间舆论在对官方舆论的抗争中，第一次取得了绝对的优势地位。 在2月9号到2月10号晚间，中共禁令出台前的一天半时间内，舆论的走向完全与《央视》当初期待的相反，在中共yabo88官网管制中罕见的出现了“管制空窗期”，令主管机关因“舆论失控”而愤怒至极。
随后，中共官方媒体《新华网》、《人民日报》等发表一系列文章，从是非界限、文明底线、媒体责任和治理责任等方面，对网路舆论抗议进行批判。指责“挺东莞、反央视”的有关言论是没有言行底线，成为了法律和道德双重失重的沉沦。
中共党媒的舆论高压，虽然使民间舆论反弹之声再度低沉，但是质疑和讽刺仍在继续。
摄影师王麒追问：“人民日报发文《文明底线不容亵渎》，我想问：当你说亩产三万 斤的时候，文明底线哪去了？当官员强奸幼女被解读为嫖宿幼女的时候，文明底线哪去了？当你们眼里只看到东莞的裸女和三亚裸男，却对中国的裸官视而不见，文 明底线又哪去了？你们亵渎我们六十多年，还有什么资格跟我们谈文明底线？”
中共启动“国安委”合法吗？
据《中国广播网》报导，中共“人大”和“政协”两会，分别定于3月3号和5号在北京开幕，中共“国家安全委员会”有望在“两会”上正式设立。预计“国安委”与“人大”配合，进行相关立法，尤其是在突发情况下进行“紧急立法”。消息引起外界关注。
《德国之声》引述中国学者、国务院农村发展中心前研究员姚监复的评论说，中共当局可能会模糊“国安委”到底“姓国”还是“姓党”的性质，在“两会”上以像征性的举手方式通过，然后使其运行。
但是，姚监复认为，“国安委”是一个超宪法的组织，它的成立本身就违反了中共的《宪法》。
姚监复说：“不知道人大会议要不要批准这样一个组织，要不要列到《宪法》中去，否则中共中央怎么能够成立一个机构，可以管安全部、军队、外交部的事呢？如果是运行的话，可能会管你《宪法》改不改，我就运行。这就证明中共是不按《宪法》办事。”
袭警被定暴恐 世维会称双重标准
2月16号，中共当局将上周五新疆阿克苏地区发生的袭警案件，定性为一起“有组织、有预谋的暴力恐怖案件”，但是流亡海外的维吾尔人团体，则指责中共在处理社会矛盾的问题上，实行歧视维族人的双重标准。
据《美国之音》报导，总部设在德国的“世界维吾尔大会”发言人迪里夏提表示，这是垄断性的专横定性。
他说，“中共针对维吾尔人的抗争，向来都是采取就地镇压，然后说成是‘有组织有预谋的恐怖活动’。而且恐怖的定义在中国是典型的双重标准。中国（汉族）人抗争，当局说他们是对社会不满。而维吾尔人抗争就成了‘有组织、有预谋’的。”
迪里夏提呼吁中共当局解除限制，允许国际媒体在不受任何阻碍的情况下采访当地的维吾尔人，以获取事件的真相。
编辑/周玉林
Dongguan Anti-Vice Expands.
Public Opinion War is a Concern
After the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece
CCTV reported Dongguan porn industry, the so-called anti-
vice movement has expanded from Guangdong Province to
the nine provinces.
However, the attention-grabbing is not the anti-vice result
“try to beat the tiger but beat the chicken”, but the public
opinion war between mainland officials and civilians.
On February 9, CCTV reports immediately aroused public
Opinions to rebound on the network.
Some netizens not only protested with the official emotional
sentence “Dongguan, hold on!" but also directly accused
CCTV of long-term selling the soul".
“CCTV’s evil is far than worse than sex workers’ selling
their bodies in Dongguan.”
Mainland media person Jia Jia said that the CCP mouthpiece
lost the long term leading ability of political issue the first time;
Public opinion initially had the advantage position
when struggling with official opinion.
From February 9 to February 10, one and a half days before
the ban from CCP, the public opinion trend was completely
contrary to CCTV’s original expectations.
It is unusual to have a control window period in CCP news.
The CCP were very angry about uncontrolled public opinion.
After that, the CCP mouthpiece Xinhua, and People’s Daily
published a series of articles to criticize the public protection
on right and wrong boundaries, civilization bottom line,
media responsibility and governance responsibilities.
They accused some remarks such as “hang on, Dongguan,
anti-CCTV" and no behavior bottom line becoming a
destruction both legally and morally.
Although the CCP media pressure makes the rebound public
voice low again, the questions and irony still continue.
Photographer Wang Qi asked: “People’s Daily issued an article
named “The bottom line can not be profaned.
I wonder, where is the bottom line when you say fifteen
thousand kg per mu?
Where is the bottom line when you only focus on Dongguan’s
naked lady and Sanya’s naked guy without seeing China’s
naked officials?
How could you talk bottom line with us after you blaspheme
us for sixty years?
Is it Legal For The Chinese Communist Party to Start
National Security Council?
According to Chinese Radio Network, the Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) “NPC" and “CPPCC" two sessions were scheduled
to start on March 3 and 5 in Beijing.
The National Security Council, is expected to be set up in “two
sessions".
It is expected that the national security council and NPC
will conduct the relevant legislation and emergency legislation
in emergency situations.
The news caused a lot of attention.
Deutsche Welle quoted Chinese scholar, former researcher
of State Rural Development Center Yao Jianfu’s comment that
the Chinese authorities may blur the national Security Council’s
surname in State or in Party.
There will be symbolically raising hands
in “two sessions" to pass.
However, Yao Jianfu believes that national security council
is a super-constitutional organization; its establishment is a
violation of the CCP’s constitution.
Yao Jianfu said:"We do not know if the National People’s
Congress need to approve such an organization and list it to
the Constitution.
Otherwise how can CCP set up a mechanism to manage the
Security Department, the military and the Foreign Ministry?
If they set it up without caring the Constitution, it proves the
CCP doesn’t act according to the Constitution."
The World Uyghur Congress Reacts to Double Standards
On February 16, the Chinese authorities characterized last
Friday’s assaulting police case in Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang
as an organized premeditated violence terror.
But the exiled Uyghur group accused the Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) of double standards when handling social
contradictions with discrimination of Uyghurs.
According to the Voice of America, based in Germany the
World Uyghur Congress spokesman Dilshat said this was
a monopoly arbitrary determination.
He said, “The CCP always took repression to Uyghurs and
characterized it as organized premeditated violence terror.
Plus the terror definition in China is always double standards.
Chinese (Han) people protests are “dissatisfied with the
community”, while Uyghur protests became “organized,
premeditated violence terror".
Dilshat called on the CCPto release restrictions and allow
international media interview local Uyghurs without hindrance
to get the truth.
Edit/Zhou Yulin
